Ask Your Legal Question. Legal Experts Answer You ASAP.

(Not a Legal Question?)

I am taking a business law II class. I need Fabor ...

Sent to Legal Experts January 24 2007 at 4:17 AM
   

I am taking a business law II class. I need Fabor Industries, Ltd v. Dori Leeds Witeck 483 SE2d 443 (NC App). I need to know did was Doris correct when she refused pay the guartantee of credit stating that she was acting as a personal guarantor for her business and not for Blind Ambitions. Is she correct

 

Optional Information:
North Carolina

Already Tried:
Nothing I really just need a legal website, are legal websites free or I would love to use this service

Customer (name blocked for privacy)
Reply
January 24 2007 at 5:02 AM (32 minutes and 48 seconds later)
         
I believe it was 1996 or 97 the question only states that in 1994 and 1995 Fabor brought suit asainst Dori Leeds.
Answer
January 24 2007 at 6:14 AM (1 hour and 12 minutes and 6 seconds later)
         
ACCEPTEDCheck Mark
Dear Customer (name blocked for privacy).

The case is available at: http://www.aoc.state.nc.us/www/public/coa/opinions/1997/960768-1.htm

Your question is answered below:

1. I need to know did was Doris correct when she refused pay the guartantee of credit stating that she was acting as a personal guarantor for her business and not for Blind Ambitions. Is she correct?

ANSWER

Generally, when a person signs a guarantee under their personal name it is a personal guarantee and he or she is liable for all debts under the loan his or her guarantee supports. In this case, Doris signed as "Doris Leeds DBA Blind Ambitions." Blind Ambitions is a sole proprietorship. A sole proprietorship is not an entity distinct from its owner as a corporation or LLC are. A sole proprietorship is the same as the person. Therefore, it was not the business debts that were guaranteed, it was the debts of Ms. Leeds that were guaranteed.

The debts Fabor wants repayment for were incurred by David and Judith Leeds DBA Blind Ambitions. Doris did not guarantee the debts of Blind Ambitions or David and Judith Leeds, she only guaranteed her personal debt. Because David and Judith Leeds incurred the debts Fabor is suing for Fabor cannot enforce Ms. Leeds' guarantee. It was Fabor's duty to update the guarantee to have David and Judith Leeds guarantee debts.


PLEASE NOTE: Responses here are for information/education only, NOT legal advice and do not form attorney-client relationship! Only licensed attorneys you hire in your state can provide legal advice.
Think you can answer this question?
Login or Become an Expert

 

DISCLAIMER: You acknowledge that any information you may obtain from individuals you contact through use of the JustAnswer service comes from those individuals, not from JustAnswer, and that JustAnswer is not in any way responsible for any of the information these third parties may supply. The site and services are provided "as is" with no warranty and no representations are made regarding the qualification of an Expert. Responses and comments on JustAnswer are for general information and are not intended to substitute for informed professional advice (such as medical, legal, investment or accounting) and do not establish a professional-client relationship. JustAnswer is not intended or designed to address EMERGENCY QUESTIONS which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service.

JustAnswer > Legal